By Eric Reuland
Pronouns and anaphors (including reflexives reminiscent of himself and herself) may possibly or needs to depend upon antecedents for his or her interpretation. those dependencies are topic to stipulations that prima facie exhibit gigantic crosslinguistic version. during this monograph, Eric Reuland provides a thought of ways those anaphoric dependencies are represented in common language in a manner that does justice to the the adaptation one reveals throughout languages. He explains the stipulations on those dependencies by way of trouble-free houses of the computational procedure of common language. He indicates that the encoding of anaphoric dependencies uses parts of the language method that each one mirror diverse cognitive capacities; hence the empirical learn he stories on bargains insights into the layout of the language process. Reuland's account reduces the stipulations on binding to self reliant homes of the grammar, none of that's particular to binding. He deals a principled account of the jobs of the lexicon, syntax, semantics, and the discourse part within the encoding of anaphoric dependencies; a window into the general association of the grammar and the jobs of linguistic and extralinguistic components; a brand new typology of anaphoric expressions; a view of crosslinguistic edition (examining proof in a variety of languages, from English, Dutch, Frisian, German, and Scandinavian languages to Fijian, Georgian, and Malayalam) that indicates harmony in variety.
Read Online or Download Anaphora and Language Design (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs) PDF
Best language & grammar books
At a world convention held in 1981 on the Universidada Estudual of Campinas (Brazil), a arguable lecture used to be given through John Searle which offered conceptual theses: that dialog doesn't have an intrinsic constitution approximately which a correct conception could be formulated, and that conversations aren't topic to (constitutive) principles.
ASIN: B002BFPUSOСловарь геральдических эмблем, символов и терминов. A most beneficial dictionary of heraldry and heraldic phrases. people with an off-the-cuff curiosity within the topic will locate the excellent descriptions valuable and should manage to gather the language of heraldry via them. however the critical scholar too will locate this an invaluable reference ebook.
The sequence publishes cutting-edge paintings on center parts of linguistics throughout theoretical frameworks in addition to experiences that offer new insights by means of development bridges to neighbouring fields comparable to neuroscience and cognitive technology. The sequence considers itself a discussion board for state of the art examine in keeping with strong empirical information on language in its quite a few manifestations, together with signal languages.
- Appraising research in second language learning : a practical approach to critical analysis of quantitative research
- Areal Features of the Anglophone World
- Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change
- Slang and Sociability: In-Group Language Among College Students
- Pidgins and Creoles beyond Africa-Europe Encounters
Extra resources for Anaphora and Language Design (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs)
The only serious attempt to date to derive binding theory from pragmatic princi ples is Levinson 2000. 7 for more discussion and criticism of Lev inson's assumptions). In evaluating such claims. note that all the information conveyed by natural language expressions is encoded in grammatical and lexical fea tures. These represent atomic elements of information content. Any mea sure of descriptive content must be made in terms of such features. Hence, even apart from the role of structure in anaphoric relations, which is discussed below, the very status of being a higher or lower marker accessibility itself rests on fundamentally linguistic notions .
X voted for x, with x= I (26) a. We elected me. b. x elected x, with x=I Similarly, the inference system must represent that (27a) entails (27b): (27) a. John hated everybody but himself. b. x hates x). Reinhart refers to representations meeting the requirements inherent in this format as logical syntax (LS), hence the name logical syntax binding for the binding relation as defined for these representations. In Reinhart's approach, binding is analyzed as the procedure of closing a property. This is reflected in the following definition, which I adopt in the present work: (28) Logical syntax binding Binding is the procedure of closing a property.
The heuristic strategy is that (9) is to be abandoned only in the face of compelling evidence. In line with (9) the following methodological guide line will be employed in this book: ( 1 0) Uniformity • • The formal properties of the computational system are uniform across languages . The formal properties of the conceptual system are uniform across languages. The same holds true for the formal properties of the realization and inter pretation systems. Together these entail that the locus of crosslinguistic variation is in the functional system, the system for marking Case, Agree ment, and so on.